The Fact About h4831sc That No One Is Suggesting

The Fact About h4831sc That No One Is Suggesting

Blog Article

I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was creating extra strain and was slower than the old stuff. I do not keep in mind if I even tried out regular h4831 or not; I'm imagining not.

They're exactly the same issue, but H4831 sc is Slash shorter so it will pack right into a case much easier then the traditional, and sometimes like our 7mm rem mag it will allow us to add much more powder then just the conventional H4831.

4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo creates .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps outside of a 26" barrel. I exploit this identical powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr tablets, so It can be wonderful to obtain 1 powder for both equally.

Of course you could. They can be a similar correct powder though the SC powder is just Lower shorter so it meters greater.

The sole variance as I are aware of it is that the SC was made to do the job via powder actions improved (which it does). The for a longer time grains never feed effectively whatsoever in a few actions. Thats my 02 :grin:

Any load data to support that? My initial believed is it is not about to burn off the many way and velocities will be gradual and all over. Could possibly be a good fireworks display!

NBTs or Hornady VMax, h4831sc but Have a very restricted offer of Varget, plus a great deal more readily available H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Practically solely, because that is certainly just what the rifles shoot the very best.

excaliber reported: I have discovered the exact opposite for h4831 vs h4831sc being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly precise powder in my 300 Get Mag.

Any load data to guidance that? My very first assumed is it is not going to burn off all of the way and velocities might be slow and far and wide. Could be a pleasant fireworks Display screen!

Why would I point out this? Exactly what is my stage? I'm not sure that there is a actual valid position besides what is well-liked with most has not been well known with me in the slightest degree in these circumstances. Do I just have a powder jinx or some thing? Just to explain to you how nuts I really am, tomorrow I am range tests a close friends new .

This is certainly an older thread, you may not get a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please take into consideration making a new thread.

Indeed, You should use the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, although the SC version may possibly allow you to get a little bit a lot more in situations where you are maxing out circumstance volume With all the standard powder ahead of achieving strain restrictions.

Am i able to assume that H4831 is often substituted for H4831sc ? I realize the physical variation but will it have an h4831sc load data effect on the melt away or velocity? I believe not but I am not 100% absolutely sure.

This looks as if an excellent location to disclose a little more information on Hodgdon, H4831 specially...I at the time had a pound of H4831SC sit within the shelf for a variety of decades. It was obtained in advance of Hodgdon commenced publicizing the "Extreme" line of powders, of which the H4831s are a part.